Detecting simulated underreporting on the Minnesota multiphasic personality inventory-3 (MMPI-3) in Veterans with past-month death/suicide ideation

Abstract: Background: We continue to have limited success in identifying Veterans at high risk of suicide, due in part to reticence of disclosing suicidal ideation. AIMS: This study used a simulated groups experimental design to evaluate the MMPI-3's ability to assess suicide risk underreporting in Veterans with past-month death/suicide ideation. Materials and methods: Thirty-nine Veterans (53.85% men) were randomized to standard and simulated underreporting groups and provided valid data on the MMPI-3 and collateral measures. We examined (1) whether simulated underreporting on the MMPI-3 (indexed by L and K scale scores) impacts SUI scale scores, (2) if these effects generalize to underreporting on extratest suicide and non-suicide measures, and (3) if MMPI-3 L and K scales incrementally predict and differentiate between Veterans with recent death/suicide ideation who were instructed to answer honestly and those instructed to underreport. Results: Groups scored significantly differently on K (g = 0.99: M(simulation) = 57.83, M(standard) = 43.72), but not L. Underreporting captured by K generalized to lower MMPI-3 SUI scale scores (g = 2.00; M(simulation) = 46.33, M(standard) = 66.81) and collateral measures of suicide risk (g = 0.69-0.79). K scores significantly predicted group membership and added incrementally to L. Discussion: The limitations and clinical implications of these finding are discussed. Conclusion: MMPI-3 K, but not L, scale scores most reliably capture defensive reporting of suicidal ideation and intent and psychopatholpgy, more broadly. However a significant amount of underreporting of suicidal ideation and intent may go undetected.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Researchers

    Identifying opioid relapse during COVID-19 using natural language processing of nationwide Veterans Health Administration electronic medical record data

    Abstract: Novel and automated means of opioid use and relapse risk detection are needed. Unstructured electronic medical record data, including written progress notes, can be mined for clinically relevant information, including the presence of substance use and relapse-critical markers of risk and recovery from opioid use disorder (OUD). In this study, we used natural language processing (NLP) to automate the extraction of opioid relapses, and the timing of these occurrences, from veteran patients' electronic medical record. We then demonstrated the utility of our NLP tool via analysis of pre-/post-COVID-19 opioid relapse trends among veterans with OUD. For this demonstration, we analyzed data from 107,606 veterans OUD enrolled in Veterans Health Administration, comparing a pandemic-exposed cohort (n = 53,803; January 2019-March 2021) to a matched prepandemic cohort (n = 53,803; October 2017-December 2019). The recall of our NLP tool was 75% and our precision was 94%, demonstrating moderate sensitivity and excellent specificity. Using the NLP tool, we found that the odds of opioid relapse postpandemic onset were proportionally higher compared to prepandemic trends, despite patients having fewer mental health encounters from which to derive instances of relapse postpandemic onset. In this research application of the tool, and as hypothesized, we found that opioid relapse risk was elevated postpandemic. The application of NLP Methods: to identify and monitor relapse risk holds promise for future surveillance, risk prevention, and clinical outcome research.