Sex, race, and ethnic disparities in cardiovascular disease risk factors among service members and Veterans

Abstract: Background: Health disparities in cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors persist among racially, ethnically, and sex diverse civilian populations. Little is known about whether these disparities persist in US military populations. The aim of this study was to examine and describe differences in CVD risk factors by sex, race, and ethnicity among US service members and veterans of Operation Enduring Freedom/Operation Iraqi Freedom conflicts. Method: Sex, racial, and ethnic differences in CVD risk factors (self-reported diagnoses of hypertension, high cholesterol, and diabetes, obese body mass index, and current smoking) were examined in 2014-2016 among 103,245 service members and veterans (age [years], M=40, SD=11; 70.3% men; 75.7% non-Hispanic White adults) enrolled in the Millennium Cohort Study. A series of ordinal regressions were conducted sequentially adjusting for sociodemographic, military, behavioral, and psychosocial factors. Results: Overall, 59% of participants reported at least 1 CVD risk factor. Men had greater odds of screening positive for CVD risk factors than did women. Non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islander adults had lower odds of screening positive for CVD risk factors than did non-Hispanic White adults. Although unadjusted models showed non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic/Latino, and non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native individuals had greater odds of screening positive for CVD risk factors, these associations were attenuated or reversed after adjusting for sociodemographic, military, behavioral, and/or psychosocial factors. Conclusion: Due to differences in CVD risk by sex, race, and ethnicity among service members and veterans, studies are needed to understand the potential mechanisms that explain persistent disparities. Implementation of CVD prevention interventions should be considered.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Researchers

    Pandemic concerns, occupational stressors, burnout, and psychological distress among U.S. Air Force remotely piloted aircraft personnel: A multidimensional mediation model

    Abstract: U.S. Air Force remotely piloted aircraft (USAF RPA) personnel face diverse stressors negatively affecting psychological health and military readiness. Prior research in diverse populations supports predictable impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on occupational stressors, burnout, and more distal outcomes. Extending earlier studies linking broad variables (e.g., COVID-19 threat → work stress → burnout), the current study tests and refines an expanded mediation model based on multiple distinct pandemic concerns, occupational stressors, and burnout facets as antecedents of psychological distress mid-pandemic in RPA personnel (N = 496). Differential representation of demands, resources, and rewards evident across distinct occupational stressors in light of job demands/resources theory guided specification of mediated pathways. SEM analysis yielded moderate fit. Following removal of non-significant paths and addition of two interpretable direct paths, fit was improved, yielding seven dominant pandemic concern → occupational stressor → burnout → psychological distress pathways. In support of domain specification, five 'hub' variables (pandemic-driven change, personal stressors, workload, leader communication, and exhaustion) emerged as key intervention targets in mitigating distress in the USAF RPA community and similar populations during future pandemic-related crises.

    Mental Health Peer reviewed