Natriuretic peptide testing in Veterans hospitalized with heart failure: Potential differences by sex

Abstract: Background: Natriuretic peptide testing (NPT) is recommended to assist in diagnosis and prognostication during heart failure hospitalization (HFH). NPT on admission for HFH and sex-based variation in NPT are unknown. Objectives We investigated the utilization of NPT among Veterans with HFH, evaluated for sex-based differences, and examined associations with demographic, clinical, and facility characteristics. Methods: Among Veterans with HFH in the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System between October 2015-September 2020, we assessed the rate of NPT on admission and sex-based differences in NPT. We determined associations with demographic, clinical covariates, (comorbidities, laboratory values, loop diuretic use), and facility characteristics using logistic regression. Results: Of 55,935 patients with HFH (women=1237 (2.2 %)), women were younger (68.3 versus 72.8 years, p < 0.001), less likely to have cardiac comorbidities, and more likely to have ejection fraction >40 %. Admission NPT occurred in 78.3 % of patients (men=78.4 %, women=74.7 %; p = 0.002). In adjusted analyses for clinical and facility-related factors, women were 15 % less likely to receive NPT compared with men [odds ratio =0.85, 95 % CI (0.75, 0.98)]. In sex-stratified models, atrial fibrillation and prior loop diuretic use were associated with increased likelihood of NPT and previous NPT was associated with decreased likelihood in both sexes. Overall associations were similar in both sexes. Conclusions: Women were less likely to receive NPT during HFH compared to men, potentially risking greater delays in HF diagnosis and treatment. Further investigation should examine the impact of the absence of admission NPT on clinical outcomes and identify strategies to improve obtaining NPT in all patients.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Researchers

    Identifying opioid relapse during COVID-19 using natural language processing of nationwide Veterans Health Administration electronic medical record data

    Abstract: Novel and automated means of opioid use and relapse risk detection are needed. Unstructured electronic medical record data, including written progress notes, can be mined for clinically relevant information, including the presence of substance use and relapse-critical markers of risk and recovery from opioid use disorder (OUD). In this study, we used natural language processing (NLP) to automate the extraction of opioid relapses, and the timing of these occurrences, from veteran patients' electronic medical record. We then demonstrated the utility of our NLP tool via analysis of pre-/post-COVID-19 opioid relapse trends among veterans with OUD. For this demonstration, we analyzed data from 107,606 veterans OUD enrolled in Veterans Health Administration, comparing a pandemic-exposed cohort (n = 53,803; January 2019-March 2021) to a matched prepandemic cohort (n = 53,803; October 2017-December 2019). The recall of our NLP tool was 75% and our precision was 94%, demonstrating moderate sensitivity and excellent specificity. Using the NLP tool, we found that the odds of opioid relapse postpandemic onset were proportionally higher compared to prepandemic trends, despite patients having fewer mental health encounters from which to derive instances of relapse postpandemic onset. In this research application of the tool, and as hypothesized, we found that opioid relapse risk was elevated postpandemic. The application of NLP Methods: to identify and monitor relapse risk holds promise for future surveillance, risk prevention, and clinical outcome research.