Well-being and suicidal ideation in U.S. Veterans: Age cohort effects during military-to-civilian transition

Abstract: Introduction: Life transitions often bring stress and uncertainty and may lead to poor long-term health outcomes if not navigated successfully. Every year over 200,000 U.S. service members transition from military to civilian life. Given that transition may be particularly challenging for younger individuals this study examined younger military Veterans’ well-being during transition and its impact on suicidal ideation as compared with middle-aged Veterans. Methods: Using data from the Veterans Metrics Initiative (TVMI) study (N=6,615), latent class analysis was used to identify age-stratified subgroups of Veterans (18–34 and 35–54 years) based on health, vocational, financial, and social well-being 1 year following military discharge. Negative binomials models were used to examine associations between subgroups and suicidal ideation at 4 data points. Data were collected in 2016–2019 and analyzed in 2024. Results: Four subgroups were identified for younger and middle-aged Veterans. For younger Veterans, subgroups included high well-being (32.3%); low well-being (24.7%); poor health and social well-being (17.3%); and poor financial well-being with health risk (25.7%). Middle-aged Veterans subgroups included high well-being with health risk (37.4%); low well-being (20.6%); poor health and social well-being (21.8%), and poor financial well-being with health risk (20.2%). Subgroups with poorer well-being had an increased rate of suicidal ideation compared with those with the highest well-being, with the strongest association with the low well-being subgroups (younger IRRs=10.1–51.0; middle-aged IRRs=11.3–26.0), followed by poor health and social well-being subgroups (younger IRRs=3.9–22.3; middle-aged IRRs=4.9–10.2). Conclusions: Findings highlight the importance of considering age cohort effects in efforts to enhance well-being and reduce suicidal ideation among transitioning Veterans.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Researchers

    Identifying opioid relapse during COVID-19 using natural language processing of nationwide Veterans Health Administration electronic medical record data

    Abstract: Novel and automated means of opioid use and relapse risk detection are needed. Unstructured electronic medical record data, including written progress notes, can be mined for clinically relevant information, including the presence of substance use and relapse-critical markers of risk and recovery from opioid use disorder (OUD). In this study, we used natural language processing (NLP) to automate the extraction of opioid relapses, and the timing of these occurrences, from veteran patients' electronic medical record. We then demonstrated the utility of our NLP tool via analysis of pre-/post-COVID-19 opioid relapse trends among veterans with OUD. For this demonstration, we analyzed data from 107,606 veterans OUD enrolled in Veterans Health Administration, comparing a pandemic-exposed cohort (n = 53,803; January 2019-March 2021) to a matched prepandemic cohort (n = 53,803; October 2017-December 2019). The recall of our NLP tool was 75% and our precision was 94%, demonstrating moderate sensitivity and excellent specificity. Using the NLP tool, we found that the odds of opioid relapse postpandemic onset were proportionally higher compared to prepandemic trends, despite patients having fewer mental health encounters from which to derive instances of relapse postpandemic onset. In this research application of the tool, and as hypothesized, we found that opioid relapse risk was elevated postpandemic. The application of NLP Methods: to identify and monitor relapse risk holds promise for future surveillance, risk prevention, and clinical outcome research.

    Mental Health Peer reviewed