Illegal drug use amongst male UK military personnel who sustained physical combat injuries: The ADVANCE cohort study

Abstract: Illegal drug use may be a consequence of sustaining a serious physical combat injury, though no known research has investigated this in a UK setting. This analysis utilises the baseline data from a longitudinal cohort (ADVANCE), to assess whether 577 UK military personnel who sustained serious physical combat injuries reported more illegal drug use compared to 565 frequency-matched personnel without such injuries. Most personnel reported no illegal drug use in the past year (88.7%). Cocaine was the most common drug reported in the past year, followed by cannabis. Injured personnel had greater odds of reporting illegal drug use in the past year compared to the comparison group (injured group: 16.3%, comparison group: 5.4%; Odds Ratio (OR) 3.09 (95% CI 2.03, 5.31)), however, no differences were observed amongst veterans in each group (OR 0.67 (95% CI 0.40, 1.27)). Higher prevalence of illegal drug use was observed amongst those of white ethnic background, lower rank, those who were single, younger, veterans, and those who reported a probable mental illness, suicidal ideation or heavy alcohol use/tobacco use. Veterans who left service at a younger age and with a shorter length of service were also identified as having higher prevalence of illegal drug use. UK Armed Forces personnel who sustained serious physical combat injuries in Afghanistan report more illegal drug use in the past year compared to demographically similar personnel without serious physical injury. Greater prevalence of illegal drug use was evident in those that left service, with >20 % of veterans reporting illegal drug use in the past year.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Researchers

    Identifying opioid relapse during COVID-19 using natural language processing of nationwide Veterans Health Administration electronic medical record data

    Abstract: Novel and automated means of opioid use and relapse risk detection are needed. Unstructured electronic medical record data, including written progress notes, can be mined for clinically relevant information, including the presence of substance use and relapse-critical markers of risk and recovery from opioid use disorder (OUD). In this study, we used natural language processing (NLP) to automate the extraction of opioid relapses, and the timing of these occurrences, from veteran patients' electronic medical record. We then demonstrated the utility of our NLP tool via analysis of pre-/post-COVID-19 opioid relapse trends among veterans with OUD. For this demonstration, we analyzed data from 107,606 veterans OUD enrolled in Veterans Health Administration, comparing a pandemic-exposed cohort (n = 53,803; January 2019-March 2021) to a matched prepandemic cohort (n = 53,803; October 2017-December 2019). The recall of our NLP tool was 75% and our precision was 94%, demonstrating moderate sensitivity and excellent specificity. Using the NLP tool, we found that the odds of opioid relapse postpandemic onset were proportionally higher compared to prepandemic trends, despite patients having fewer mental health encounters from which to derive instances of relapse postpandemic onset. In this research application of the tool, and as hypothesized, we found that opioid relapse risk was elevated postpandemic. The application of NLP Methods: to identify and monitor relapse risk holds promise for future surveillance, risk prevention, and clinical outcome research.