Moral injury risk and protective factors in women Veterans

Abstract: Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to describe risk and protective factors for moral injury (MI) in women veterans. The factors identified in this article are based on the findings of previous scholarly work, including a moral injury in women veterans project, a chaplain support study, and Dr. Lisa Miller’s work on spirituality. Recent Findings: Using a grounded theory approach, researchers solicited responses from nearly 50 women veterans on their moral injurious experiences. Risk factors for MI included sexual assault, hostile work environment, gender harassment, retaliation, lack of integrity, and combat and occupation stressors. Based on the chaplain support study and Miller’s spirituality research, this article identified the following protective factors: safe environment in which to work, adherence to and reinforcement of standards of conduct, trusted neutral person in which to confide, community support, and spirituality. Summary: Many types of events can lead to moral injury in military women. For women who self-identified as morally injured, researchers divided these potential moral injurious events (PMIEs) into eight categories. Conversely, protective factors are those resources that can help prevent MI or assist those who do become morally injured. This article describes five protective factors.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Researchers

    Identifying opioid relapse during COVID-19 using natural language processing of nationwide Veterans Health Administration electronic medical record data

    Abstract: Novel and automated means of opioid use and relapse risk detection are needed. Unstructured electronic medical record data, including written progress notes, can be mined for clinically relevant information, including the presence of substance use and relapse-critical markers of risk and recovery from opioid use disorder (OUD). In this study, we used natural language processing (NLP) to automate the extraction of opioid relapses, and the timing of these occurrences, from veteran patients' electronic medical record. We then demonstrated the utility of our NLP tool via analysis of pre-/post-COVID-19 opioid relapse trends among veterans with OUD. For this demonstration, we analyzed data from 107,606 veterans OUD enrolled in Veterans Health Administration, comparing a pandemic-exposed cohort (n = 53,803; January 2019-March 2021) to a matched prepandemic cohort (n = 53,803; October 2017-December 2019). The recall of our NLP tool was 75% and our precision was 94%, demonstrating moderate sensitivity and excellent specificity. Using the NLP tool, we found that the odds of opioid relapse postpandemic onset were proportionally higher compared to prepandemic trends, despite patients having fewer mental health encounters from which to derive instances of relapse postpandemic onset. In this research application of the tool, and as hypothesized, we found that opioid relapse risk was elevated postpandemic. The application of NLP Methods: to identify and monitor relapse risk holds promise for future surveillance, risk prevention, and clinical outcome research.