Investigating risk factors of dissociative and complex posttraumatic stress disorder across diagnostic systems and potential implications: Latent class analyses

Abstract: Objective: Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and more complex posttraumatic symptomatology (i.e., dissociative PTSD [D-PTSD] and complex PTSD [CPTSD]) are differently described in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.; DSM-5) and the International Classification of Diseases (11th ed.; ICD-11). Although the choice of system may affect diagnostic prevalence rates and treatment outcome, less is known about the more complex symptoms and their associated risk factors. Method: To investigate both D-PSTD and CPTSD in Northern Irish military veterans (n = 436) using latent class analysis and associated risk factors to gain a deeper understanding of the potential implications of applying one diagnostic system instead of the other. Results: The latent class analyses revealed a DSM-5 four-class solution and an ICD-11 five-class solution with both a highly symptomatic D-PTSD class (27.52%) and CPTSD class (27.9%) identified. Similar associations with risk factors were found across the diagnostic systems (e.g., medium to strong effect sizes for prior traumatic exposure, depression, anxiety, dissociation, and alcohol use). Conclusions: Both D-PTSD and CPTSD appear to be highly prevalent among Northern Irish veterans, and interestingly, similar effect sizes were found for the investigated risk factors for highly symptomatic groups across diagnostic systems. Research is needed to determine the generalizability of the results.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Researchers

    Identifying opioid relapse during COVID-19 using natural language processing of nationwide Veterans Health Administration electronic medical record data

    Abstract: Novel and automated means of opioid use and relapse risk detection are needed. Unstructured electronic medical record data, including written progress notes, can be mined for clinically relevant information, including the presence of substance use and relapse-critical markers of risk and recovery from opioid use disorder (OUD). In this study, we used natural language processing (NLP) to automate the extraction of opioid relapses, and the timing of these occurrences, from veteran patients' electronic medical record. We then demonstrated the utility of our NLP tool via analysis of pre-/post-COVID-19 opioid relapse trends among veterans with OUD. For this demonstration, we analyzed data from 107,606 veterans OUD enrolled in Veterans Health Administration, comparing a pandemic-exposed cohort (n = 53,803; January 2019-March 2021) to a matched prepandemic cohort (n = 53,803; October 2017-December 2019). The recall of our NLP tool was 75% and our precision was 94%, demonstrating moderate sensitivity and excellent specificity. Using the NLP tool, we found that the odds of opioid relapse postpandemic onset were proportionally higher compared to prepandemic trends, despite patients having fewer mental health encounters from which to derive instances of relapse postpandemic onset. In this research application of the tool, and as hypothesized, we found that opioid relapse risk was elevated postpandemic. The application of NLP Methods: to identify and monitor relapse risk holds promise for future surveillance, risk prevention, and clinical outcome research.