Provider decisions to use evidence-based psychotherapy for PTSD among Veterans: Assessments of overidentification with the sick role and comorbid personality disorders

Abstract: Despite being recommended as first-line treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) by the Veterans Health Administration (VHA), the two evidence-based psychotherapies (EBPs), cognitive processing therapy (CPT) and prolonged exposure (PE), remain underutilized. Provider perceptions of certain clinical characteristics may pose barriers to EBP utilization. VHA providers (N = 227) in PTSD clinical teams across the United States rated their levels of preference for CPT, PE, and other psychotherapy with each of the six clinical characteristics (high severity, sexual assault, combat, guilt, overidentification with the sick role, and comorbid personality disorders) and reported whether they had received training in CPT and PE. We conducted repeated measures ANOVA and multivariate multiple regression analyses to evaluate providers’ patterns of treatment utilization by clinical characteristics and the effects of training on treatment preference. We found that providers preferred to engage in the two EBPs over others forms of psychotherapy when their patients’ PTSD is characterized by high severity, sexual assault, combat, or guilt. Providers preferred to engage in CPT with patients who overidentify with the sick role but did not prefer to engage in either of the EBPs over other psychotherapy with patients who exhibit comorbid personality disorders. Additionally, prior trainings in CPT and PE were associated with increased preference for the respective EBPs. Given that patients’ clinical characteristics may constitute legitimate clinical concerns, patient-level factors will require special attention to discern actual contraindications from perceived clinical barriers without empirical support. More research is also needed to differentiate the underlying reasons for overidentification with the sick role.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Researchers

    Identifying opioid relapse during COVID-19 using natural language processing of nationwide Veterans Health Administration electronic medical record data

    Abstract: Novel and automated means of opioid use and relapse risk detection are needed. Unstructured electronic medical record data, including written progress notes, can be mined for clinically relevant information, including the presence of substance use and relapse-critical markers of risk and recovery from opioid use disorder (OUD). In this study, we used natural language processing (NLP) to automate the extraction of opioid relapses, and the timing of these occurrences, from veteran patients' electronic medical record. We then demonstrated the utility of our NLP tool via analysis of pre-/post-COVID-19 opioid relapse trends among veterans with OUD. For this demonstration, we analyzed data from 107,606 veterans OUD enrolled in Veterans Health Administration, comparing a pandemic-exposed cohort (n = 53,803; January 2019-March 2021) to a matched prepandemic cohort (n = 53,803; October 2017-December 2019). The recall of our NLP tool was 75% and our precision was 94%, demonstrating moderate sensitivity and excellent specificity. Using the NLP tool, we found that the odds of opioid relapse postpandemic onset were proportionally higher compared to prepandemic trends, despite patients having fewer mental health encounters from which to derive instances of relapse postpandemic onset. In this research application of the tool, and as hypothesized, we found that opioid relapse risk was elevated postpandemic. The application of NLP Methods: to identify and monitor relapse risk holds promise for future surveillance, risk prevention, and clinical outcome research.