US military Veteran perspectives on eating disorder screening, diagnosis, and treatment: A qualitative study

Abstract: Objective: We aimed to explore US veteran perspectives on eating disorder screening, diagnosis, patient–provider conversations, and care in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). Method: Rapid qualitative analysis of 30–45 min phone interviews with 16 (N = 16) veterans with an electronic health record ICD‐10 eating disorder diagnosis, who received care at one of two VHA healthcare systems in Connecticut or California. Topics covered included: conversations with providers about eating disorder symptoms, diagnosis, and referral to treatment; feedback about an eating disorder screener, and; reflections on eating disorders among veterans and VHA's effort to address them. Results: Most veterans reported difficulty understanding and defining the problems they were experiencing and self‐diagnosed their eating disorder before discussing it with a provider. Treatment referrals were almost universally for being overweight rather than for an eating disorder, often leading veterans to feel misunderstood or marginalized. Overall, veterans were enthusiastic about the screener, preferred screening to be conducted by primary care providers, and noted that conversations needed to be non‐stigmatizing. There was consensus that VHA is not doing enough to address this issue, that group support and therapy could be beneficial, and that resources needed to be centralized and accessible. Discussion: For the most part, veterans felt that, at best, eating disorders and disordered eating are overlooked, and at worst, conflated with overweight. The majority of veterans got referred for weight loss or weight management services but would welcome the opportunity to be screened for, and referred to, eating disorder treatment.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Researchers

    Envisioning a new racial grievance reporting and redress system for the United States military

    Abstract: A better understanding of the weaknesses and strengths of the military’s racial grievance reporting and redress system is needed to understand where and how it can be improved to encourage racial grievance reporting, facilitate timely and effective responses, and promote a more inclusive environment to better support the careers, satisfaction, and well-being of minority service members. The authors identified gaps, ambiguities, inconsistencies, and reported problems in the military racial grievance system through an examination of policies and structures and offered recommendations to improve diversity, equity, and inclusion in the armed forces.