Clinical characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of Veterans with cerebrospinal fluid culture positive for Gram-negative rod bacteria: A retrospective analysis over 18 years in 125 Veterans Health Administration hospitals

Abstract: Optimal management for patients with bacterial ventriculitis/meningitis due to Gram-negative rods (GNRs) has yet to be well investigated. We assessed the clinical characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of patients with a positive cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) culture for GNRs. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all patients with a positive CSF culture within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) system during 2003-2020. Clinical and microbiological characteristics between the true meningitis and contamination groups were compared. Of the 5919 patients with positive CSF cultures among 125 nationwide VHA acute-care hospitals, 297 (5.0%) were positive for GNRs. Among 262 patients analyzed, 156 (59.5%) were assessed as patients with true meningitis, and 106 (40.5%) were assessed as patients with contaminated CSF cultures. Patients with true meningitis had a significantly higher CSF protein (median 168 vs 57 mg/dL, p < 0.001), CSF white blood cell count (median 525 vs 3/mu L, p = 0.008) and percentage of neutrophils in CSF (median 88 vs 4%, p < 0.001). Enterobacterales were more common in the true meningitis group, while unidentified GNR or polymicrobial CSF cultures were more common in the contamination group. The all-cause 90-day mortality was 25.0% (39/156) in patients with true meningitis and 10.4% (11/106) in those with contaminated CSF cultures. None of the 11 patients with contaminated CSF cultures who died were considered due to missed meningitis. More than 40% of patients with a positive CSF culture with GNR did not receive treatment without negative consequences. Careful clinical judgment is required to decide whether to treat such patients.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Researchers

    Identifying opioid relapse during COVID-19 using natural language processing of nationwide Veterans Health Administration electronic medical record data

    Abstract: Novel and automated means of opioid use and relapse risk detection are needed. Unstructured electronic medical record data, including written progress notes, can be mined for clinically relevant information, including the presence of substance use and relapse-critical markers of risk and recovery from opioid use disorder (OUD). In this study, we used natural language processing (NLP) to automate the extraction of opioid relapses, and the timing of these occurrences, from veteran patients' electronic medical record. We then demonstrated the utility of our NLP tool via analysis of pre-/post-COVID-19 opioid relapse trends among veterans with OUD. For this demonstration, we analyzed data from 107,606 veterans OUD enrolled in Veterans Health Administration, comparing a pandemic-exposed cohort (n = 53,803; January 2019-March 2021) to a matched prepandemic cohort (n = 53,803; October 2017-December 2019). The recall of our NLP tool was 75% and our precision was 94%, demonstrating moderate sensitivity and excellent specificity. Using the NLP tool, we found that the odds of opioid relapse postpandemic onset were proportionally higher compared to prepandemic trends, despite patients having fewer mental health encounters from which to derive instances of relapse postpandemic onset. In this research application of the tool, and as hypothesized, we found that opioid relapse risk was elevated postpandemic. The application of NLP Methods: to identify and monitor relapse risk holds promise for future surveillance, risk prevention, and clinical outcome research.