National comparison of Veterans and non-veterans medical center patient satisfaction ratings: An HCAHPS survey data analysis

Abstract: This study compared patient satisfaction with quality of care received in US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) hospitals and non-VA hospitals. Out of the 137 VA hospitals in operation, 113 reported Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey results, which were used in this analysis. Each VA hospital was matched with a non-VA hospital within the same city that had the most similar bed count. Hospitals were compared using eight of the 29 total questions on the HCAHPS patient satisfaction survey, covering areas of care delivery including: doctor and nurse communication, staff responsiveness, cleanliness, preference consideration, care transition, overall rating, and likelihood of recommendation. For all eight questions, VA hospitals received significantly more positive responses, and non-VA hospitals received significantly more moderate and negative responses. This showed that patients were more satisfied with care in VA hospitals than non-VA hospitals. A secondary analysis aimed to determine whether there were differences in VA patient satisfaction between different regions of the US. The 113 VA hospitals were grouped into 4 regions (Northeast, Midwest, South, and West) and patient satisfaction was compared using the same eight HCAHPS questions as the primary analysis. Overall, results did not yield extensive differences between these regions; however, there was a trend of the South having more negative responses than the Midwest. Results suggest that recent calls for higher-quality VA care and increases in VA funding have led to greater patient satisfaction for our nation’s veterans.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Researchers

    Identifying opioid relapse during COVID-19 using natural language processing of nationwide Veterans Health Administration electronic medical record data

    Abstract: Novel and automated means of opioid use and relapse risk detection are needed. Unstructured electronic medical record data, including written progress notes, can be mined for clinically relevant information, including the presence of substance use and relapse-critical markers of risk and recovery from opioid use disorder (OUD). In this study, we used natural language processing (NLP) to automate the extraction of opioid relapses, and the timing of these occurrences, from veteran patients' electronic medical record. We then demonstrated the utility of our NLP tool via analysis of pre-/post-COVID-19 opioid relapse trends among veterans with OUD. For this demonstration, we analyzed data from 107,606 veterans OUD enrolled in Veterans Health Administration, comparing a pandemic-exposed cohort (n = 53,803; January 2019-March 2021) to a matched prepandemic cohort (n = 53,803; October 2017-December 2019). The recall of our NLP tool was 75% and our precision was 94%, demonstrating moderate sensitivity and excellent specificity. Using the NLP tool, we found that the odds of opioid relapse postpandemic onset were proportionally higher compared to prepandemic trends, despite patients having fewer mental health encounters from which to derive instances of relapse postpandemic onset. In this research application of the tool, and as hypothesized, we found that opioid relapse risk was elevated postpandemic. The application of NLP Methods: to identify and monitor relapse risk holds promise for future surveillance, risk prevention, and clinical outcome research.