Evaluating WIC engagement and food insecurity among active duty military families

Abstract: INTRODUCTION: Nearly a quarter of active duty service members identified as food insecure in a 2022 Department of Defense report. Food insecurity impacts military readiness, retention, and recruitment. The Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) is a federal food supplementation program that can mitigate food insecurity for service members with children less than 5 years of age. To date, there is a lack of standardized screening for WIC eligibility or enrollment for service members and their families. This project sought to evaluate WIC awareness and enrollment as well as the prevalence of food insecurity at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 26-question survey was developed to assess WIC awareness, source of WIC information, food insecurity, and nutritional insecurity. Our team developed and utilized a novel WIC screening algorithm to rapidly screen families for WIC eligibility. These tools were administered to families presenting for care at the Walter Reed National Military Medical Center pediatrics and obstetric outpatient clinics during the month of July 2022. This study was approved by the institutional review board at Walter Reed. RESULTS: A total of 108 (25%) of the 432 surveyed participants were eligible for WIC, with odds of WIC eligibility increasing for lower-ranking and younger service members. Of the 432 participants, 354 (81.9%) were aware of WIC. Enlisted service members were more likely than officers to know about WIC (P = 0.03), and of the 354 participants aware of WIC, a higher proportion of enlisted rank respondents learned about WIC from a military source (P = 0.01). Among the 108 participants eligible for WIC, only 38 (35.2%) reported being enrolled in WIC. Among WIC-eligible respondents who knew about WIC, being enrolled in the WIC program was not associated with rank, branch of service, sponsor gender, or sponsor age. CONCLUSIONS: Despite proven efficacy, WIC remains an underutilized resource for eligible military families. Our results show that a standardized screening approach at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center increased identification of WIC-eligible active duty service members by 180%, with approximately $150,000 a year in increased food supplementation benefits. Military healthcare and readiness leaders should embrace efforts to increase knowledge of, referral to, and enrollment in WIC to increase family health, well-being, and military family readiness.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Policy & Practice

    Emerging treatments for common mental health conditions affecting Veterans: D-cycloserine interventions

    Abstract: There are a number of treatments that have an emerging evidence base and could be considered in the management of common mental health conditions affecting veterans. Emerging and adjunct treatments are typically considered when an individual’s adherence or response to accepted or conventional treatment/s is poor (i.e., chronic, treatment-resistant, or treatment-refractory mental health conditions). The aim of the rapid evidence assessment (REA) was to identify and critically evaluate the current evidence on emerging and adjunct treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and common mental health conditions affecting veterans. From the four databases that were searched, 25 studies met the inclusion criteria, including 12 secondary sources: four (4) systematic reviews (SRs) and eight (8) SRs with accompanying meta-analyses (MAs). The studies within these secondary sources (i.e., those contained within SRs and MAs) were extracted to a database containing the primary sources (i.e., randomised controlled trials, RCTs). From this collated set of articles (281 in total), all studies that did not meet the inclusion criteria were excluded (e.g., cohort and case-control studies), and all duplicate studies were removed (i.e., often the same RCT would appear in multiple SRs and MAs; as well as being directly retrieved by the search strategy). The final set of articles included 13 RCTs. The findings from these studies were narratively synthesised, and risk of bias assessments were conducted for each RCT. Strengths of the REA include the focus on peer-reviewed Level I and Level II evidence (NHMRC, 2009) from scientific journals in the fields of health, medicine, psychiatry, and psychology (including a specialist database developed by the US Department of Veterans’ Affairs focusing on literature relevant to veterans with PTSD). Limitations of the REA include the exclusion of potentially relevant papers that were published prior to 2017 and the exclusion of non-English language papers. It is difficult to draw conclusions and recommendations regarding DCS interventions from the body of evidence considered by the REA. DCS is proposed to enhance fear extinction or extinction learning via partial agonism of the NMDA receptor (neurobiological mechanism of action). Thus, most of the included studies examined the effects of DCS administration in combination with exposure-based psychotherapy for anxiety disorders. Some studies appear to indicate that DCS improves outcomes from evidence-based psychotherapy. However, due to the mixed findings across studies, it is difficult to recommend the use of DCS interventions in specific clinical situations. Further high-quality research is required.

    Mental Health Peer reviewed