Differences in risk of Alzheimer's disease following later-life traumatic brain injury in Veteran and civilian populations

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To directly compare the effect of incident age 68+ traumatic brain injury (TBI) on the risk of diagnosis of clinical Alzheimer's disease (AD) in the general population of older adults, and between male veterans and nonveterans; to assess how this effect changes with time since TBI. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Community-dwelling traditional Medicare beneficiaries 68 years or older from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS). DESIGN: Fine-Gray models combined with inverse-probability weighting were used to identify associations between incident TBI, post-TBI duration, and TBI treatment intensity, with a diagnosis of clinical AD dementia. The study included 16 829 older adults followed over the 1991-2015 period. For analyses of veteran-specific risks, 4281 veteran males and 3093 nonveteran males were identified. Analysis of veteran females was unfeasible due to the age structure of the population. Information on occurrence(s) of TBI, and onset of AD and risk-related comorbidities was constructed from individual-level HRS-linked Medicare claim records while demographic and socioeconomic risk factors were based on the survey data. RESULTS: Later-life TBI was strongly associated with increased clinical AD risk in the full sample (pseudo-hazard ratio [HR]: 3.22; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.57-4.05) and in veteran/nonveteran males (HR: 5.31; CI: 3.42-7.94), especially those requiring high-intensity/duration care (HR: 1.58; CI: 1.29-1.91). Effect magnitude decreased with time following TBI (HR: 0.72: CI: 0.68-0.80). CONCLUSION: Later-life TBI was strongly associated with increased AD risk, especially in those requiring high-intensity/duration care. Effect magnitude decreased with time following TBI. Univariate analysis showed no differences in AD risk between veterans and nonveterans, while the protective effect associated with veteran status in Fine-Gray models was largely due to differences in demographics, socioeconomics, and morbidity. Future longitudinal studies incorporating diagnostic procedures and documentation quantifying lifetime TBI events are necessary to uncover pathophysiological mediating and/or moderating mechanisms between TBI and AD.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Researchers

    Identifying opioid relapse during COVID-19 using natural language processing of nationwide Veterans Health Administration electronic medical record data

    Abstract: Novel and automated means of opioid use and relapse risk detection are needed. Unstructured electronic medical record data, including written progress notes, can be mined for clinically relevant information, including the presence of substance use and relapse-critical markers of risk and recovery from opioid use disorder (OUD). In this study, we used natural language processing (NLP) to automate the extraction of opioid relapses, and the timing of these occurrences, from veteran patients' electronic medical record. We then demonstrated the utility of our NLP tool via analysis of pre-/post-COVID-19 opioid relapse trends among veterans with OUD. For this demonstration, we analyzed data from 107,606 veterans OUD enrolled in Veterans Health Administration, comparing a pandemic-exposed cohort (n = 53,803; January 2019-March 2021) to a matched prepandemic cohort (n = 53,803; October 2017-December 2019). The recall of our NLP tool was 75% and our precision was 94%, demonstrating moderate sensitivity and excellent specificity. Using the NLP tool, we found that the odds of opioid relapse postpandemic onset were proportionally higher compared to prepandemic trends, despite patients having fewer mental health encounters from which to derive instances of relapse postpandemic onset. In this research application of the tool, and as hypothesized, we found that opioid relapse risk was elevated postpandemic. The application of NLP Methods: to identify and monitor relapse risk holds promise for future surveillance, risk prevention, and clinical outcome research.

    Mental Health Peer reviewed