Choice and motor impulsivity in Veterans with mild traumatic brain injury with and without history of suicide attempt

Abstract: Traumatic brain injury is associated with increased risk for suicide, but the underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. One candidate mechanism is impulsivity, which includes both choice impulsivity (e.g., preference for smaller, immediate rewards) and motor impulsivity (inability to inhibit prepotent motor responding). We evaluated these facets of impulsivity in Veterans classified according to their history of mild TBI (mTBI) and/or prior suicide attempt. 99 Veterans were classified as having no mTBI or suicide attempt (control, n = 35), mTBI but no suicide attempt (mTBI, n = 42), or mTBI and prior attempt (mTBI+SA, n = 22). A computerized temporal discounting task (Monetary Choice Questionnaire) assessed choice impulsivity and a Go/No-go task assessed motor impulsivity. On temporal discounting, the control group showed less choice impulsivity than the mTBI group. Temporal discounting was not associated with suicide attempt history. However, among the mTBI+SA group, those with high-lethality suicide attempts showed less choice impulsivity than those with low-lethality attempts. No group differences emerged on the Go/No-go task. The findings are consistent with choice impulsivity as a potential pathway by which mTBI affects risk for suicide. The finding that high-lethality attempts were associated with greater willingness to wait for reward supports the emerging view of heterogeneous underlying pathways to suicide risk, with distinct phenotypes that implicate different therapeutic options.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Researchers

    Qualitative analysis of the lived experience of reproductive and pediatric health care in the military health care system

    Abstract: Introduction: Persistent inequities exist in obstetric and neonatal outcomes in military families despite universal health care coverage. Though the exact underlying cause has not been identified, social determinants of health may uniquely impact military families. The purpose of this study was to qualitatively investigate the potential impact of social determinants of health and the lived experiences of military individuals seeking maternity care in the Military Health System. Materials and methods: This was an Institutional Review Board-approved protocol. Nine providers conducted 31 semi-structured interviews with individuals who delivered within the last 5 years in the direct or purchased care market. Participants were recruited through social media blasts and clinic flyers with both maximum variation and homogenous sampling to ensure participation of diverse individuals. Data were coded and themes were identified using inductive qualitative research methods. Results: Three main themes were identified: Requirements of Military Life (with subthemes of pregnancy notification and privacy during care, role of pregnancy instructions and policies, and role of command support), Sociocultural Aspects of the Military Experience (with subthemes of pregnancy as a burden on colleagues and a career detractor, postpartum adjustment, balancing personal and professional requirements, pregnancy timing and parenting challenges, and importance of friendship and camaraderie in pregnancy), and Navigating the Healthcare Experience (including subthemes of transfer between military and civilian care and TRICARE challenges, perception of military care as inferior to civilian, and remote duty stations and international care). Conclusions: The unique stressors of military life act synergistically with the existing health care challenges, presenting opportunities for improvements in care. Such opportunities may include increased consistency of policies across services and commands. Increased access to group prenatal care and support groups, and increased assistance with navigating the health care system to improve care transitions were frequently requested changes by participants.